Subject	That table you posted doesn't seem to favorable to our cars
Posted by	Barry (NJ) on April 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM
	This message has been viewed 198 times.
In Reply To	300ZX Consumer Guide Rating: 38 (out of 100) posted by ELIM on April 27, 2011 at 03:31 PM
Message	but a quick read of the page doesn't indicate any real short-comings.
Follow Ups	300ZX Consumer Guide Rating: 38 (out of 100) - ELIM 15:31:40 04/27/11 That table you posted doesn't seem to favorable to our cars - Barry (NJ) 16:07:02 04/27/11 I think one has to consider thier target audience. - zellamay 16:23:45 04/27/11 Well, I'll give'em the 2 on the quietness - RobZ32 16:34:11 04/27/11 RX7 and the Supra didn't fair any differently. - MixManMash 16:49:12 04/27/11 *fare. 8 > 7. - Gromit 17:11:42 04/27/11 this is a case where less is more (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 17:15:00 04/27/11 sphincter says what? - Gromit 17:20:25 04/27/11 Right from their verbage: - MixManMash 17:21:14 04/27/11 Right from their verbage: "Performance 8" (300ZX) (n/m) - Gromit 17:23:39 04/27/11 why are you taking an ages old article so personally? - Adam (NoVA) 17:39:50 04/27/11 calm yourself - Gromit 17:50:07 04/27/11 i was reading the combined responses to the threads as - Adam (NoVA) 18:02:28 04/27/11 Somethings just can't be summed up by a number. - MixManMash 17:42:27 04/27/11 funny since it was on motor trends top ten list forever - Rogy 22:55:10 04/27/11 What the hell, why 2 for cargo? - JayT (Tampa,FL) 00:01:41 04/28/11 and....? My pal's teen daughter thinks lady bla bla is the - LJZTT 07:30:59 04/28/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.